Reimagining Philippine Education in the Era of Education 5.0: Empowering Teachers through Generative Artificial Intelligence and Design Thinking
Main Article Content
Keywords
Design Thinking, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Teachers, Education 5.0, Philippine Education
Abstract
Persistent challenges in Philippine education, as highlighted by the EDCOM II reports, continue to affect learning outcomes and system efficiency across levels, placing considerable pressure on teachers who must manage overlapping administrative responsibilities, curriculum demands, and classroom needs. As the nation moves toward the vision of Education 5.0, an era that emphasizes innovation, adaptability, and the integration of technology, teachers face additional expectations to transform their practice within a still-developing educational landscape. Much remains to be done to strengthen the foundations of Philippine education and to prepare educators for these shifts. This concept note considers two complementary approaches, Design Thinking and Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), as potential frameworks to support teachers in this period of educational transformation. Nonetheless, several critical questions remain: (1) How can Design Thinking and Generative AI be combined to support teachers' instructional tasks? (2) What guidelines are necessary to help teachers use Generative AI productively and responsibly? and (3) How can the education system create an enabling environment where both Design Thinking and Generative AI can thrive? This concept note introduces the DT-AI (Design ThinkingArtificial Intelligence) Model, a conceptual framework that integrates the empathic, problem-solving principles of Design Thinking with the adaptive, data-driven capabilities of Generative Artificial Intelligence. The DTAI Model positions teachers as reflective designers who co-create learning experiences with AI as a cognitive partner, enhancing creativity, efficiency, and contextual relevance. It also highlights the need for systemic readiness, ethical guidelines, and capacity-building initiatives that enable responsible and meaningful AI use in education.
References
Behare, N., Panchbhai, A., Bhardwaj, P., Jadhav, P. B., Behare, S. N., Waghulkar, S., & Sharma, S. (2024). Education 5.0. In Advances in computational intelligence and robotics (pp. 129-156). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4326-5.ch006
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
Chemsi, G., Elimadi, I., Sadiq, M., & Radid, M. (2024). Teaching and assessment in the era of Education 5.0. In G. Chemsi (Ed.), Teaching and assessment in the era of Education 5.0 (pp. 1-20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3045-6
Choi, G. W., Kim, S. H., Lee, D., & Moon, J. (2024). Utilizing generative AI for instructional design: Exploring strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. TechTrends, 68(4), 832-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00963-0
Choudhary, M. A., & Sharma, S. (2024). Creativity in Indian classrooms: Can design thinking help in fostering creativity? International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6), Article 32409. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.32409
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of 'design thinking' and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
Eamcharoen, P. (2024). Design thinking for creating educational innovations for teachers in the digital age. Journal of Innovation in Education, 23(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.55003/jie.23203
EDCOM II. (2024). Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education (EDCOM II year one report). House of Representatives of the Philippines.
EDCOM II. (2025). Fixing the foundations: A matter of national survival (EDCOM II year two report). House of Representatives of the Philippines.
Erenea, R. R., & Sarmiento, C. P. (2025). Integrating design thinking into e-learning activities in mathematics for STEM students. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530251358511
Erita, Y., Hevria, S., Miaz, Y., Fauzi, R., & Fadillah, N. (2024). Current trends transforming learning in elementary schools through ChatGPT: A systematic literature review. In D. Roy & G. Fragulis (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3220, Article 060008). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234735
Evmenova, A. S., Borup, J., & Shin, J. K. (2024). Harnessing the power of generative AI to support ALL learners. TechTrends, 68(4), 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00968-9
Faresta, R. A., Nicholas, T. Z. S. B., & Chi, Y. (2025). Technology and social bonds: Exploring the dynamics of human connection in the Society 5.0 era. International Journal of Education in Technology and Engineering, 2(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v2i1.14056
Fousiya, O. P., & Saleem, D. T. M. (2024). Education 5.0: Nurturing essential life skills for the future generation. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), Article 16511. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.16511
Gagaza, M., & Sarmiento, C. (2022). Investigating mathematics teachers' perceived design thinking mindset and related factors. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 59-64). https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514291
Guettala, M., Bourekkache, S., Kazar, O., & Harous, S. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education: Advancing adaptive and personalized learning. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 13(3), 460-489. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.235
He, S., & Lu, Y. (2024). The effectiveness of Gen AI in assisting students' knowledge construction in humanities and social sciences courses: Learning behaviour analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 7041-7062. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2415444
Hennessey, E., & Mueller, J. (2020). Teaching and learning design thinking (DT): How do educators see DT fitting into the classroom? Canadian Journal of Education, 43(2), 499-521.
Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
Khang, A., Muthmainnah, M., Seraj, P. M. I., Al Yakin, A., & Obaid, A. J. (2023). AI-aided teaching model in education 5.0. In A. Khang (Ed.), Handbook of research on AI-based technologies and applications in the era of the metaverse (pp. 62-86). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8851-5.ch004
Kiryakova, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a supportive tool for teachers' activities. International Conference of the Virtual Learning, 19, 385-396. https://doi.org/10.58503/icvl-v19y202432
Magat, R. J. B., & Sangalang, E. M. (2024). Teachers' familiarity, perceptions, and training needs on the use of ChatGPT in mathematics instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(4), 1471-1487. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4332
Matthew, U. O., Oyekunle, D., Akpan, E. E., Oladipupo, M. A., Chukwuebuka, E. S., Adekunle, T. S., Waliu, A. O., & Onumaku, V. C. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) on sustainable development goal 4 for tertiary education. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (pp. 263-292). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2418-9.ch010
Montero-Mesa, L., Fraga-Varela, F., Vila-Couñago, E., & Rodríguez-Groba, A. (2023). Digital technology and teacher professional development: Challenges and contradictions in compulsory education. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101029
Naraidoo, S., Doargajudhur, M., Hosanoo, Z., & Zaung, N. (2024). Navigating the pedagogical innovation and digital transformation landscape in the Education 5.0 era. In G. Chemsi (Ed.), Teaching and assessment in the era of Education 5.0 (pp. 21-45). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3045-6.ch001
Patrício, M. R., & Gonçalves, B. F. (2024). ChatGPT: Systematic review of potentials and limitations in education. In A. Rocha, J. H. Díez, C. Ferras, & M. D. Rebolledo (Eds.), Lecture notes in networks and systems: Vol. 933. Information technology and systems (pp. 339-348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-542565_32
Pratyusha, Y. B. V. L., & Varghese, B. (2024). Era of Education 5.0. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (pp. 235-254). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8191-5.ch009
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Sabharwal, D., & Mitra, A. (2024). Impact of AI on student learning and teacher outcomes in Education 5.0. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (pp. 293-316). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8191-5.ch012
Shahidi Hamedani, S., Aslam, S., Mundher Oraibi, B. A., Wah, Y. B., & Shahidi Hamedani, S. (2024). Transitioning towards tomorrow's workforce: Education 5.0 in the landscape of Society 5.0: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101041
Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., & Marques, R. P. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of era 5.0 for a more humanistic and sustainable society—A literature review. Societies, 12(6), Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060149
von Thienen, J. P. A., Clancey, W. J., Corazza, G. E., & Meinel, C. (2018). Theoretical foundations of design thinking part I: John E. Arnold's creative thinking theories. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research: Understanding innovation (pp. 13-40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-60967-6_2
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
